Press Conference — April 23, 2026
When a School District Silences Parents, We Show Up With a Microphone
Karen Mayer Cunningham held a public press conference at Prosper ISD to address ongoing special education violations, denial of parental rights, and systemic noncompliance.
By Karen Mayer Cunningham | Special Education Boss® | Founder, Special Education Academy
On April 23, 2026, I held a public press conference outside of Prosper ISD in Prosper, Texas. I was there because a family I represent has been systematically denied their procedural rights and safeguards under IDEA for the entirety of their child’s schooling.
This was not my first choice. It was my last one. We tried the meetings. We tried the emails. We tried reaching out to the Texas Education Agency. We tried going to the administration building in person. We were met with silence, obstruction, and eventually a school district police officer asking us to leave a public sidewalk.
So we brought a microphone.
The Student at the Center of This
Daphne is a student with multiple eligibilities under IDEA: Other Health Impairment for Rett Syndrome, Speech Impairment, and Deaf and Hard of Hearing. She uses a speech-generating device and communicates with determination and clarity. She is smart, she is capable, and she has been placed in the wrong educational setting since kindergarten.
Daphne was placed in a functional academics classroom. On the district’s own website, the requirement for that setting is a mild or moderate cognitive impairment. When I asked the team directly — twice — whether Daphne had a mild or moderate cognitive impairment, the answer was no. She doesn’t even have that eligibility.
She has been in the wrong placement for her entire school career. That is a denial of a free, appropriate public education for years.
And where does Daphne perform best? According to the district’s own 200+ page IEP document — in general education inclusion settings. The data is in their own paperwork.
What We Found — A Pattern of Violations
This is not a case of one bad meeting or one miscommunication. This is a documented pattern of systemic procedural violations that denied the parent meaningful participation in the IEP process. Here is what we found:
→ The IEP document was 211 pages long — filled with unnecessary, redundant information that created an administrative barrier to parental participation
→ Parent concerns were reduced to a single line — “parent does not like this goal” — instead of being documented as required under 34 CFR 300.324
→ The parent was told the district’s formatting “cannot be changed” — a clear indicator of predetermination under 19 TAC 89.1050
→ The special education coordinator stated she could “control your questions” and “control the ARD agenda”
→ Service providers in the meeting looked to the coordinator for permission to speak — and were stopped when their answers did not align with the district’s position
→ The district continued an IEP meeting for over an hour after the parent’s advocate had left, pressuring the parent to sign and disagree — then denied it happened
→ Portions of the IEP meeting recordings were conveniently missing from the file provided to the parent
→ The student’s deaf and hard of hearing services consisted of two hours of consult to teachers for the entire year — no direct services, no standalone goals
→ The district checked “most significant cognitive impairment” on state assessment paperwork for a student who does not have a cognitive disability eligibility
→ Open records revealed that the student’s IEP was only distributed to core teachers — not to music, PE, or specials teachers who also serve the student
From the Parent
Daphne’s mother, Lacey Calvert, read a prepared statement at the press conference. In it, she documented violations of 34 CFR 300.501 (the right to bring an advocate), 34 CFR 300.324 (the requirement to consider parent concerns), and 34 CFR 300.322 (parental participation in IEP meetings).
She described being told the team was “scared” because she hired an advocate. She described having her hours of collaborative input reduced to a footnote. She described threats to end meetings because of her “tone” — when no abusive language was present.
Raising difficult questions about legal noncompliance is a parent’s right. It is not a behavioral issue.
Daphne’s Own Words
Daphne uses a speech-generating device. The average person speaks about 150 words per minute. A speech-generating device produces about 15 words per minute. So you have to wait. It doesn’t mean there’s a deficit — she just needs more time.
When asked about school, Daphne wrote this sentence herself with minimal support from her outside provider:
“The classroom is so sad.”
Just because her body doesn’t cooperate every day does not mean she doesn’t have thoughts, feelings, and the right to an appropriate education. We have to be her voice until the district is willing to listen to hers.
What Happened When We Showed Up
On the day of the press conference, a school district police officer was sent to ask us to leave the property. When asked for the statute being violated, none was provided. We moved to the public sidewalk — three feet from where we had been standing — and continued.
The only official communication from the district in response to our documented concerns was a request to cancel the press conference. Not a response to the violations. Not a plan to address the noncompliance. A request to stop talking about it.
The day before the press conference, I drove five hours to attend Daphne’s IEP meeting in person. The special education coordinator who had controlled every prior meeting did not attend.
The team acted very differently that day.
What We Are Doing About It
We are preparing a systemic complaint to the Texas Education Agency supported by documentation from multiple families. A systemic complaint carries more weight because it demonstrates a pattern — not an isolated incident.
We are filing complaints with the State Board for Educator Certification requesting review of professional conduct and consideration of licensure sanctions for individuals who have misrepresented the law in IEP meetings.
We will be hosting a follow-up live webinar in the coming weeks to share documentation, answer questions, and provide updates.
We are not going away. We will not be silenced. And we will continue to advocate until this student — and every student in this district — receives the education they are entitled to under the law.
For Families in This District
If You Have Experienced Similar Treatment
If you are a parent, educator, or former staff member of Prosper ISD and you have experienced or witnessed similar conduct — inflated IEP documents, denial of parental input, predetermination, retaliation, or misrepresentation of the law in IEP meetings — we want to hear from you.
Your information will be included in the systemic complaint to the Texas Education Agency. The state looks at patterns. One family is a complaint. Multiple families with the same documented experience is a systemic problem that demands a full audit.
Contact: Karen@SpecialEducationBoss.com
The Bigger Picture
When special education is done right, it is transformative. But when it is used as a system of control — when parents are silenced, when documents are weaponized, when educators are afraid to speak — it harms the most vulnerable students in our schools.
Parents are equal stakeholders in the IEP process. That is not an opinion. It is federal law. And when a district’s response to a parent exercising their rights is to send a police officer to the parking lot, something is deeply wrong.
If you tell the truth, you don’t have to shrink back. We are going to continue telling the truth until this is resolved.
This is why we sit at the table prepared.
Take Action
JOIN SPECIAL EDUCATION ACADEMY
400+ hours of training. Know your rights. Show up prepared.
Includes The Epic IEP™, the Federal & State Laws Guide, and the Epic IEP™ Para.
Contact Karen directly: Karen@SpecialEducationBoss.com
Watch the Press Conference
YouTube: Watch on YouTube
About the Author
Karen Mayer Cunningham is the founder of Special Education Boss® and Special Education Academy. She has served families navigating the special education process for 30 years. Karen is the author of The Epic IEP™, The Epic IEP™: PARA, and The Epic IEP™ Guide to Federal and State Law for Special Education. She trains everyone who sits at the IEP and 504 table — parents, educators, advocates, and professionals — to navigate and negotiate successful student outcomes.
This content documents a public press conference and is educational in nature. Special Education Boss® does not provide legal advice or legal representation. Special Education Boss® educates and equips families and professionals to understand and navigate special education systems.
“When we get it right for the child, we get it right for everyone.”
— Karen Mayer Cunningham
0 Comments